Cover Image

AI Doubts, Private Credit Stress, and Tariff Turmoil: Why the Market Feels Fragile

February 27, 20265 min read

Nvidia Delivers — But The Market Shrugs

Nvidia reported extraordinary numbers.

  • Q4 revenue: $68.1 billion, up 73% year-over-year

  • EPS growth: 82%

  • Guidance: Beat expectations

  • Hyperscaler AI capex projected at $650 billion in 2026, up from $450 billion in 2025

These are historic figures for the largest market cap company in the world.

And yet:

  • The stock was up just 1% after hours.

  • It opened down the next morning.

  • It closed down.

Even more striking: despite projected 67% EPS growth, Nvidia trades at roughly 25x earnings — a modest multiple for that growth profile.

The message is clear:

The market believes the numbers.
It doubts the durability.

The skeptical narrative around AI has real power now.


Tariff Turmoil: Messy, But Not Catastrophic

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Over the weekend:

  • A temporary 15% tariff was imposed under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act.

  • Section 301 investigations were launched to reimpose country-specific tariffs.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated revenue impact should be roughly unchanged.

Markets dipped Monday, but there was no panic.

Why?

Because markets have become conditioned to political volatility. Unless tariff policy materially shifts growth or inflation trajectories, the reaction remains contained.

The bigger risks lie elsewhere.


Bitcoin Still Fails Its Own Test

A CNBC headline read:

“Bitcoin falls as Trump tariff moves raise uncertainty.”

That headline should not exist.

If Bitcoin were truly a hedge against fiat debasement and government instability, uncertainty should push it higher.

Instead, Bitcoin continues to correlate with tech risk sentiment.

It behaves like:

  • A speculative tech proxy

  • A risk-on trade

  • A volatility vehicle

Not digital gold.

This reinforces the argument:

Crypto remains speculation about speculating.


Private Credit: The $1.8 Trillion Risk

The private credit market now stands at $1.8 trillion.

It has never been stress-tested through:

  • Sector disruption (AI hitting software)

  • Liquidity pressure

  • Retail redemptions

All three are emerging simultaneously.


Blue Owl and the Redemption Freeze

Blue Owl froze redemptions in one of its retail-oriented private credit funds.

Simultaneously, it sold $1.4 billion in loans near par.

Three buyers were major pension institutions.

The fourth buyer was Kuvari Insurance.

Here’s where it gets complicated.


The Insurance Loop

Private equity firms pioneered a model:

Originate private credit → sell to captive insurer → lever further.

Blue Owl is emulating that model.

It previously acquired Kuvari Asset Management, which manages assets for Kuvari Insurance.

Kuvari Insurance then purchased loans from Blue Owl’s distressed funds.

This raises critical concerns:

  • Not arms-length.

  • Policyholder money purchasing private equity-originated loans.

  • Leverage potentially increases via CLO structures (possibly 10:1).

Insurance liabilities are long-duration and retail-backed.

Private credit loans are illiquid and increasingly exposed to software disruption.

The opacity is troubling.


The Software Exposure Problem

Private equity aggressively financed software buyouts over the past decade.

Estimates suggest:

More than 20% of private credit exposure is tied to software transactions.

Now consider:

  • AI threatens pricing power.

  • AI threatens labor-heavy SaaS models.

  • AI could commoditize previously high-margin software products.

UBS recently estimated that private credit default rates could rise to 15% under AI-driven disruption.

Even if that estimate proves high, elevated defaults would ripple through:

  • Retail funds

  • 401(k) allocations

  • Insurance balance sheets

The leverage layering amplifies systemic risk.


Smart Money Pricing Risk

Saba Capital launched a tender offer for Blue Owl retail funds at a 20–35% discount.

That is institutional money signaling:

Mark-to-market risk is real.

When sophisticated investors demand a 30% haircut, pay attention.


AI Fear Spreads Beyond Software

Earlier this week:

  • Cybersecurity stocks fell sharply.

  • Payments stocks sold off.

  • Even legacy enterprise software names were hit.

Cybersecurity faces AI-based automation threats.

Legacy software faces displacement fears.

Payments? Less clear.

Visa and Mastercard have powerful network effects connecting billions of users and merchants. AI is unlikely to dismantle that structural moat easily.

But fear spreads quickly.


Salesforce: Solid Numbers, Wrong Time

Salesforce reported:

  • Revenue growth of 12% year-over-year

  • Organic growth of 8%

  • EPS beat

  • Light forward revenue guidance

In normal times, this would be acceptable.

In a sector under AI siege?

It is insufficient.

The stock is down 25% year-to-date.

Insider buying remains minimal.

That absence speaks volumes.


Housing: Frozen, Not Crashing

Home Depot and Lowe’s both reported modest results.

  • Home Depot same-store sales: 0.4%

  • Lowe’s same-store sales: 1.3%

The issue isn’t collapsing demand.

It’s mortgage lock-in.

With sub-4% mortgages widespread, homeowners aren’t moving.

Mortgage rates dipping below 6% may help at the margin.


Solar: A Breakdown

First Solar missed badly.

  • EPS below expectations

  • Revenue guidance far below consensus

Residential solar has already been weak due to higher rates and subsidy reductions.

Now commercial solar is showing strain.

Policy hostility toward renewables adds pressure.

The commercial resilience narrative just cracked.


Circle: Profitable, But Rate Sensitive

Circle reported:

  • Revenue up 77%

  • Stablecoin circulation up 72%

  • Stock up sharply

However, most revenue comes from interest earned on reserves.

If the Fed cuts rates meaningfully, earnings decline.

Circle must diversify beyond crypto-native customers to sustain growth.


Why Didn’t Markets Collapse?

A viewer asked why markets did not crash on weak GDP, elevated PCE, and tariff uncertainty.

Answer:

Markets have grown numb to catastrophe forecasts.

Since the financial crisis, pundits have predicted disaster repeatedly.

The economy has remained resilient.

One weak data point does not equal recession.


Retail vs. Institutional Edge

Institutional investors possess:

  • Data platforms like Bloomberg

  • Sellside research access

  • Expert networks

  • Direct management access

  • Industry consultants

And yet, active managers often underperform indices.

Information advantage does not guarantee performance advantage.

Retail investors can compete by:

  • Staying disciplined

  • Avoiding leverage

  • Focusing on structural moats

  • Ignoring noise


The Three Risks That Matter

  1. AI capex sustainability and return on investment

  2. Private credit stress, especially software exposure

  3. The private equity–insurance leverage nexus

These are slow-burning risks.

They are opaque.

And they are systemic.


Bottom Line

Nvidia’s numbers prove AI spending is real.

Private credit stress proves risk is building.

Tariffs add noise.

Software faces disruption.

Insurance leverage is rising.

Markets appear calm.

But beneath the surface, structural fragility is increasing.

That’s the wrap.


Thanks for reading this week’s wrap.
If you’d like to catch my interviews and market breakdowns, visit The Real Eisman Playbook or subscribe to the Weekly Wrap channel on YouTube.


This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Please consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

I’m Steve Eisman, an investor and fund manager best known for predicting the 2008 housing market collapse. I’ve spent my career studying markets, risk, and the psychology that drives financial decisions. Today, I continue to invest and share lessons from decades of watching cycles repeat.

Steve Eisman

I’m Steve Eisman, an investor and fund manager best known for predicting the 2008 housing market collapse. I’ve spent my career studying markets, risk, and the psychology that drives financial decisions. Today, I continue to invest and share lessons from decades of watching cycles repeat.

LinkedIn logo icon
Instagram logo icon
Youtube logo icon
Back to Blog